RE: Fwd: Did language drive society or vice versa?

From: Bruce Jones (BruceJ@nwths.com)
Date: Thu May 11 2000 - 22:03:20 BST

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "RE: Fwd: Did language drive society or vice versa?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA28340 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 11 May 2000 21:58:29 +0100
    Message-ID: <B6E47FBD3879D31192AD009027AC929C3688CC@NWTH-EXCHANGE>
    From: Bruce  Jones <BruceJ@nwths.com>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Fwd: Did language drive society or vice versa?
    Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 16:03:20 -0500
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Wade T.Smith [SMTP:wade_smith@harvard.edu]
    > Subject: RE: Fwd: Did language drive society or vice versa?
    >
    >
    > >Why can't animals have societies?
    > >First what is your definition of a society?
    >
    > They can- they do.
            [BJ]
            Thank you

    > But, if we accept the sentence "Did language drive society or vice
    > versa?" then we are compelled to see the difference between those animals
    > that have language, and those that don't, and compare their organization.
    > There is much reason to say all animals have a society and that human
    > language lends only, uh, culture to the mix....
            [BJ]
            Not to nit pick here ... but .... define language! If language is
    described as the articulation, through a system of signals, of basic
    survival needs; hunger, fear, joy, sadness, danger, and lack of danger then
    ALL species have a language. Even caterpillars have a language. So follows
    if language is required to have a society then ALL animals have a society.

            If language is defined in the very narrow context of the ability to
    express philosophical and abstract concepts that can be acted upon in a
    meaningful manner. Then only man has language and only man has society.

            Not disagreeing with you but trying find a tree in a forest.

            If we take the stand that all animals have language and all animals
    have a society and if memes are an integral part of the language of society
    then memetics IS at the atomic level of all interactions. However, if we
    take the position that memes must propagate their selfness to survive and
    memes can only be replicated through abstract ideas ..... then only man can
    have memes and memes are required for society.

            my $0.02 ... again

            Bruce

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 11 2000 - 21:58:48 BST