Re: Fwd: Did language drive society or vice versa?

From: Chuck Palson (cpalson@mediaone.net)
Date: Thu May 11 2000 - 08:16:28 BST

  • Next message: Bruce Jones: "RE: a memetic experiment- an eIe opener"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA26007 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 11 May 2000 13:14:05 +0100
    Message-ID: <391A5E4C.A93575FB@mediaone.net>
    Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 08:16:28 +0100
    From: Chuck Palson <cpalson@mediaone.net>
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I)
    X-Accept-Language: en
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Fwd: Did language drive society or vice versa?
    References: <39192CB7.63A10E4F@mediaone.net> <00051109415601.00619@faichney>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Robin Faichney wrote:

    > On Wed, 10 May 2000, Chuck Palson wrote:
    > >Robin Faichney wrote:
    > >
    > >> So you're a creationist?
    > >
    > >No. I am not saying things come of nothing, only that the results are unpredictable.
    >
    > You're shifting your ground -- our argument was about whether human evolution
    > was improbable. I'm very happy to accept evolution is unpredictable. But if
    > you still hold to the former, then what causes these improbable things to
    > happen, if not God?

    It seems to me that you are phrasing the question in such a way as to force the answer, -
    i.e., a loaded question. The loading comes when you force cause into it. True accidents
    don't first look for a cause before they happen.

    Or, look at it another way. Hyperreligious people (Wilson wrote recently that they have
    discovered the gene for "hyperreligiousity") tell us that the normal curve doesn't by
    itself constitute an explanation because it doesn't answer the question of what caused
    events to happen in that distribution. Do you buy that question?

    >
    >
    > Personally, I think all those who insist on the improbability of things being
    > as they are, are pushing a disguised creationist, or at least vitalist, agenda.
    >
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 11 2000 - 13:14:27 BST