Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA20648 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 10 May 2000 14:02:20 +0100 Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D31CEB16D@inchna.stir.ac.uk> From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk> To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: Central questions of memetics Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 14:00:26 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Well, in the UK pornography research is quite limited so you've got to have
a good theoretical basis! :-)
> ----------
> From: Wade T.Smith
> Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 1:56 pm
> To: memetics list
> Subject: RE: Central questions of memetics
>
> On 05/10/00 08:45, Vincent Campbell said this-
>
> >So why, in
> >pornography, for example, probably the most obvious of the primal factors
> >being explored, are there 'stars'- both performers and directors, whose
> work
> >is more widely viewed, and more highly regarded by fans/industry?
>
> Ah- so this whole memetics thing is just an excuse to get a grant to
> watch Racquel Darrian tapes at work....
>
> Shoulda known.
>
> - Wade
>
> ===============================================================
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
>
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 10 2000 - 14:03:11 BST