Re: A useless meme for Chuck

From: Tyger (void@internet-zahav.net.il)
Date: Thu May 11 2000 - 02:53:21 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: a memetic experiment- an eIe opener"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA20413 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 10 May 2000 13:52:54 +0100
    Message-ID: <008b01bfbaeb$b0ebfd80$03000004@r2z3h3>
    From: "Tyger" <void@internet-zahav.net.il>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <20000509235452.80254.qmail@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Re: A useless meme for Chuck
    Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 03:53:21 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    maybe I can get Chuck out of the payment..:-)
    an irritating tune is supposedly 'Bad' for the recipient. However that
    disregards the fact that the brain involved got hold of the said tune be
    being exposed to it in a given society. what is useful to this brain is
    being part of that society. the fact that this society creates a tune which
    is irritating to the individual, is a side product to be worked with on an
    individual , meme- contra-meme. Hence , this tune is Good for the recipient
    even (and maybe even in spite of) if the recipient being irritated by it.
    someone mentioned bureaucracy, and that may be looked at similarly,
    irritating on the discreet level usefull on the meta-level, revert to useful
    on the discreet level.

    Tyger

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Diana Stevenson" <dianaxf@hotmail.com>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 1:54 AM
    Subject: A useless meme for Chuck

    >
    > Chuck - an example of a useless meme is surely one of Dawkins' originals:
    an
    > irritating tune which goes round and round in our minds. If I have a tune
    > on the brain last thing at night, I wake up with it still on the brain in
    > the morning and it can recur throughout the day. Usually it's a tune I
    > don't even like!
    >
    > While the tune may have been useful to the person who "wrote" it, can you
    > tell me how it is useful to those of us whose brains continually replicate
    > it? Or why we will sing or whistle it to pass it on? (I exclude
    advertising
    > jingles - those aren't the ones that stick with me).
    >
    > Do I qualify for the promised $100?:)
    >
    > Diana
    > ------
    >
    >
    > ________________________________________________________________________
    > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 10 2000 - 13:53:23 BST