Re: a memetic experiment- an eIe opener

From: Chuck Palson (cpalson@mediaone.net)
Date: Tue May 09 2000 - 14:52:39 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: Fwd: Did language drive society or vice versa?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA16568 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 9 May 2000 19:49:48 +0100
    Message-ID: <39181827.FCEA0E19@mediaone.net>
    Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 14:52:39 +0100
    From: Chuck Palson <cpalson@mediaone.net>
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I)
    X-Accept-Language: en
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: a memetic experiment- an eIe opener
    References: <200005091722.SAA01678@faichney.demon.co.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Robin Faichney wrote:

    > >Chuck wrote:
    > >
    > ><<Richard - I don't want to say it outright for pedagogical reasons, but
    > >what
    > >do you suppose tight little subcultures do to stay tight? :) Clue: why did
    > >nonsensical grammatical rules become the obsession of the emerging middle
    > >class in the 18th century?>>
    > >
    > >I'm guessing that your implication is that "staying tight" == "utility".
    > >Why? No one would argue that all memes have some EFFECT, even a tiny one.
    > >But is having an effect the same as being useful? Useful to who? What
    > >memetics says is that memes evolve to have effects that are useful TO THE
    > >MEME.
    >
    > That's absolutely right, but it might be worth adding: it does NOT imply
    > that memes "have a life of their own". Neither do genes. To assume
    > otherwise is to misunderstand evolutionary theory. There's nothing
    > magical about either genetics or memetics. I repeat: you (Chuck) really
    > need to read Dennett.
    >
    > --

    Thanks for the tip - and maybe I will one of these days. So far, however, I'm
    simply not inspired by what I have seen here. The best is Richard Brodie
    because he understands its propogandistic value - which I have seen from the
    beginning.

    >
    > Robin Faichney
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 09 2000 - 19:50:04 BST