Re: a memetic experiment- an eIe opener

From: Chuck Palson (cpalson@mediaone.net)
Date: Tue May 09 2000 - 14:02:09 BST

  • Next message: Chuck Palson: "Re: Central questions of memetics"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA16258 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 9 May 2000 18:59:22 +0100
    Message-ID: <39180C51.8D7748A3@mediaone.net>
    Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 14:02:09 +0100
    From: Chuck Palson <cpalson@mediaone.net>
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I)
    X-Accept-Language: en
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: a memetic experiment- an eIe opener
    References: <NBBBIIDKHCMGAIPMFFPJAEJPEMAA.richard@brodietech.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Richard Brodie wrote:

    > Chuck wrote:
    >
    > <<Richard - I don't want to say it outright for pedagogical reasons, but
    > what
    > do you suppose tight little subcultures do to stay tight? :) Clue: why did
    > nonsensical grammatical rules become the obsession of the emerging middle
    > class in the 18th century?>>
    >
    > I'm guessing that your implication is that "staying tight" == "utility".
    > Why? No one would argue that all memes have some EFFECT, even a tiny one.
    > But is having an effect the same as being useful? Useful to who? What
    > memetics says is that memes evolve to have effects that are useful TO THE
    > MEME.
    >

    You guessed right, and we may be getting somewhere by your statement that
    indeed, memes are useful. To who? I get the contradictory messages from
    Blackmore that on the one hand she takes the analogy to genes quite seriously
    sometimes, and on the other that it is "just" an analogy. It seems to me that
    saying it is useful to the meme is taking it pretty seriously. If you mean
    that literally, I have no idea what you mean - I can't even imagine that a
    word in and of itself competes with other words for memory space. As far as I
    know, brain scans show that the decision to use a word comes from an area
    outside of memory and corresponds to a particular idea that has to be
    communicated. In other words, it's the human being that makes the decision
    that benefits. I still don't understand how the adoption of the metaphor of an
    independent meme gets us anywhere.

    >
    > Richard Brodie richard@brodietech.com
    > http://www.memecentral.com/rbrodie.htm
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 09 2000 - 18:59:38 BST