Censorship !!

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Mon May 08 2000 - 19:58:36 BST

  • Next message: Bruce Jones: "RE: Censorship !!"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA11066 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 8 May 2000 19:36:22 +0100
    Message-ID: <001601bfb91f$b5f7bda0$7505bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: "memetics" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: Censorship !!
    Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 20:58:36 +0200
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000D_01BFB930.2DE033A0"
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    Dear members,

    Something very disturbing is happened.

    I am trying now for a whole week to mail a message to the list concerning an
    essay I wrote. I would have liked that all members could read it and maybe
    have opened a discussion about it.

    But, it seems that my message is hold back at the level of the human site
    manager, I don't like that !

    Reason, it is to long (3 x A4 format) !! There are indeed longer items on the
    list,you know !!
    What disturbs me the most, is that vital information is hold back not for me,but to all members of this list !

    It is the purpose of the list, I presume to filter out what is vital or not,isn't !?
    If there are messages which are not vital,not interesting or whatever, it is to the members to decide if they are or not ! Not a strange hand who makes the choise for us. That is what I call censorship !

    The consequence,may be, is that very important information is already lost,and that people who had this info has lost their interest in memetics,even worse are now our ennemies !
    Of course, it could be that is the policy on this list ,but dear members, think
    about it ! We discuss memetics, it seems there are strong contra-memes working here !

    I hope this message will convince the people out there to put my message
    trought; I repeat, it is giving to the members of this list to decide if the
    message brings anything new to the search into memetics or not !!

    Be warned !

    Kenneth

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 08 2000 - 19:36:38 BST