RE: objections to "memes"

From: Richard Brodie (richard@brodietech.com)
Date: Wed Mar 22 2000 - 20:23:12 GMT

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "RE: Self-Acquisition"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA06481 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 22 Mar 2000 20:24:55 GMT
    From: "Richard Brodie" <richard@brodietech.com>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: objections to "memes"
    Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 12:23:12 -0800
    Message-ID: <NBBBIIDKHCMGAIPMFFPJOELDEIAA.richard@brodietech.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
    In-Reply-To: <A4400389479FD3118C9400508B0FF230040BC0@DELTA.newhouse.akzonobel.nl>
    Importance: Normal
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    So I ask again, how do you explain it?

    Richard Brodie richard@brodietech.com www.memecentral.com/rbrodie.htm

    -----Original Message-----
    From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    Of Gatherer, D. (Derek)
    Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 8:20 AM
    To: 'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'
    Subject: RE: objections to "memes"

    Richard:
    I forget, Derek... how do you explain a learned behavior -- say cracking an
    egg open with one hand against the edge of a bowl -- being repeated over and
    over again if nothing is stored internally?

    Derek:
    Something must be happening internally, and it may well be localised, eg.
    the cabbies are all exercising their posterior hypothalami, but
    a) probably what goes on in my brain when I crack an egg is not the same as
    what goes on in yours, except in the grossest regional sense (maybe chefs,
    like cabbies, have particular parts of their brains that ... etc), so
    nothing internal replicates in any sense of the word 'replicate', except the
    fudgiest, hand-waviest etc.
    b) even if something internal does replicate in any sense worthy of the
    name, we can't currently observe it given the technology we have.

    However, the behaviour _does_ replicate and we _can_ observe it.

    In the summer of 98 I posted a short piece to the list called 'Doing the
    neural walk' (can't remember what the source of the title was) which takes
    John Eccles' description of the neural correlates of a simple behaviour, and
    shows just how
    a) difficult it would be to detect any replicating neural event, due to
    their extreme complexity, and
    b) inherently unlikely that there are such things, given what we know about
    motor control of behaviour.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 22 2000 - 20:25:07 GMT