Re: objections to "memes"

From: Joe E. Dees (joedees@bellsouth.net)
Date: Wed Mar 22 2000 - 00:08:21 GMT

  • Next message: Robert G. Grimes: "Re: objections to "memes""

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA03908 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 22 Mar 2000 00:06:13 GMT
    Message-Id: <200003220004.TAA18259@mail4.lig.bellsouth.net>
    From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 18:08:21 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: objections to "memes"
    In-reply-to: <00032117001101.00976@faichney>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
    Organization: Reborn Technology
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: objections to "memes"
    Date sent: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 16:50:41 +0000
    Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    > On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Robert Logan wrote:
    > <snip>
    > >For me quarks might or
    > >might not exist but using them in a model helped to explain many of the
    > >regularities of high energy scattering. All we know for sure is that SU(3)
    > >symmetry holds and that one can explain that in terms of quarks.
    >
    > I guess we can say we know for sure that patterns of human behaviour replicate
    > or are replicated via imitation. Can we say that one can explain that in terms
    > of memes? Or can we only restate it using memetic terminology? (Exactly which
    > memetic terminology would depend on whether you think memes are in brains or
    > behaviour or both, but the explanation/restatement dichotomy remains in any
    > case. Doesn't it?)
    >
    > >Whether
    > >quarks are a reality or a theoretical construct is a philosophical
    > >question that science can not address.
    >
    > That just seems to beg to have "memes" substituted for "quarks".
    >
    It is not all imitation; one can listen to and follow instructions
    without doing anything that the instructor is doing (only doing what
    (s)he is saying).
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    >
    >
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 22 2000 - 00:06:25 GMT