Re: objections to memes

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Sun Mar 19 2000 - 22:05:23 GMT

  • Next message: Robert G. Grimes: "Re: objections to memes" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA27279 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 19 Mar 2000 22:07:19 GMT
Subject: Re: objections to memes
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 17:05:23 -0500
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <20000319220522.AAA2476@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.112]>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    Dan Plante made this comment not too long ago --

    >If someone even remotely familiar with
    >the field wants to write a book for the popular press outlining the emergence
    >of concious thought through microtubule reception of quantum flux solitons
    >from
    >Tau Ceti, they're going to do it regardless, I imagine.

    Have you been reading Jack Sarfatti, by any chance?

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 19 2000 - 22:07:28 GMT