Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA25002 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 18 Mar 2000 20:45:22 GMT Message-ID: <001301bf911e$2deb3960$2508bed4@default> From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be> To: "memetics" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: Re:objections to "memes" Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 22:08:58 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0010_01BF9126.8ED56E00" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Robert Logan wrote on 18/03/2000
<I wonder why people who believe that memes are a useless concept bother
to advocate their position.>
Robert,
I shouldn't bother mush about that,though!
What is better for the meme-meme propagation than free propaganda!
Even that people think we're strange or excentric,don't let it come to your heart,
it is in the interest of meme-theory!
Regards,
Kenneth
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 18 2000 - 20:45:33 GMT