Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA24871 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 18 Mar 2000 19:49:37 GMT Message-ID: <006801bf9116$62fcb5a0$100bbed4@default> From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be> To: "memetics" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: Re:Complete Thoughts Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 21:13:11 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0065_01BF911E.C4101D20" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dan Plante wrote this on 16/03/2000
<A sentence is a Complete Thought>
I agree on the <Written> aspect of the problem.Indeed only written down you
have then a ' complete thought',but nothing more than that!!
"Betty went",is without any feedback,it is a hard cold statement without any
brainactivity which explains,do the explaining whatever must be explained.
I said it before and I say it again,in the real meaning of the words " complete thought" you have to count in all the possible angles of the problem,all the
possible associations with that thought make up its ' completeness'.
Of course,partly it is an unconscient process,aspect/associations are just
being touched on,ready to pop up when needed.
Regards,
Kenneth
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 18 2000 - 19:49:45 GMT