Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id IAA11803 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 5 Mar 2000 08:21:30 GMT From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk> Organization: Reborn Technology To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Subject: Re: new line: what's the point? Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 07:59:37 +0000 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.21] Content-Type: text/plain References: <200003050734.CAA08389@mail2.lig.bellsouth.net> Message-Id: <00030508033500.00439@faichney> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On Sun, 05 Mar 2000, Joe E. Dees wrote:
>> On Sat, 04 Mar 2000, Wade T.Smith wrote:
>> >>>But, memes themselves are the blocks upon which subjectivity rests.
>> >>
>> >>The blocks upon which it rests, or the bricks of which it is made?
>> >
>> >Neither really- genetics are the blocks, I guess, that subjectivity sits
>> >upon- but, it's much more as if consciousness (and thus memesis) is the
>> >vapor produced by the engine of the mind.
>>
>> You assume that "memesis" is bound to consciousness, which you might have
>> noticed, not everyone around here has accepted, yet, even if you have.
>>
>Yeah- besides you, who? let's ask for a roll call.
I'm surprised you're so confident on this, but maybe that's just me. I've seen
such roll calls before, to which hardly anyone bothered to respond, and there
are plently of other reasons to doubt the usefulness of such a procedure, but
if you want to go ahead with it, don't let me get in your way.
-- Robin Faichney===============================This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 05 2000 - 08:21:38 GMT