Re: new line: what's the point?

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Wed Mar 01 2000 - 12:35:45 GMT

  • Next message: tyger2: "Re: Monkeys stone herdsman in Kenya"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA00944 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 1 Mar 2000 12:38:12 GMT
    Subject: Re: new line: what's the point?
    Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 07:35:45 -0500
    x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <20000301123517.AAA14203@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.122]>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Soc Microlab 2 made this comment not too long ago --

    >This still leaves the question of what *level* memetics becomes a useful
    >application, and I say, (after Dennett) that it is at the level of meaning
    >rather than below that.

    This statement, and the baboon study, have led me to this (not vital, I'm
    sure, but, I am here mostly swimming with one arm) - if the meme is
    anything, (if what we are is unique, and it more and more seems to seem
    that way) - the meme is _what we use to get others to understand_. It is
    dependent not only on self-awareness, but upon the awareness that there
    are other selves.

    And that _is_ a wide and encompassing region of _being_ - here - in this
    world, and in this culture. Science, and study, and explanations, have
    always needed the view from the outside, the impartial and disinterested
    observer, somehow watching and noting without bias. The scientist needs
    to be, first and foremost, a person without memes. The scientific method
    is a structure designed to mightily eliminate any effects of the observer.

    Is memetics a scientific method to study culture? IMHO, it should be.

    Because the meme is that mechanism in the mind that goes, "No, no, _this_
    is what I mean, not that."

    That this sort of explanatory communication can take place unconsciously
    _and_ consciously, well, I accept that. But it is memetic to impart, not
    simply to import.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 01 2000 - 12:38:21 GMT