RE: What are memes made of?

From: Bruce Jones (BruceJ@nwths.com)
Date: Tue Feb 29 2000 - 18:50:09 GMT

  • Next message: Lloyd Robertson: "Re: Monkeys stone herdsman in Kenya"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA10362 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 29 Feb 2000 18:46:41 GMT
    Message-ID: <B6E47FBD3879D31192AD009027AC929C368810@NWTH-EXCHANGE>
    From: Bruce  Jones <BruceJ@nwths.com>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: What are memes made of?
    Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 12:50:09 -0600
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Robin Faichney [SMTP:robin@faichney.demon.co.uk]
    >
    > On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Joe E. Dees wrote:
    > >>
    > >Without communication, there can be no memetics, for it is by
    > >means of communication that memes replicate. What is
    > >necessary for communication is necessary for memetics.
    > >Memetic multiplication is effected by means of dissemination,
    > >which is communication to multiple receivers.
    >
    > My point is this: given all the existing concepts, such as meaning, and
    > the
    > whole semiotic toolbag, what purpose does the meme concept serve? What
    > place is
    > there for a "selfish" replicator in a world of consciously communicating
    > individual minds? I thought memetics was an alternative scenario.
    > Otherwise,
    > why bother with memes at all?
    >
            [BJ] Robin et. al.:

            Good point !!!

            I will throw in my $0.02 here to see if I am thinking straight about
    memes myself.

            We have all studied Grammar, and the use of words in sentence
    structure. We have all studied the effectiveness of words as they are used
    on an individual basis and in groupings of words. We all know it is much
    more pleasant to say grilled catfish than to say the heat degenerated flesh
    of a bottom dwelling, trash eating, aquatic animal. This all falls into the
    realm of semantics.

            We have all learned in government and civics class how ideas shape
    and move governments to wage war, make peace, trade and change power
    structures. We have all seen generations of people --at least in America --
    defined by popular idioms ... 'neat', 'cooool', 'hip', etc.

            To me memetics is the origin of thought as it defines a culture ...
    family, group, community, regional, and national. A saying in one part of a
    country is expressive of the culture of that region just as much as the
    dialect, accent, or physical characteristics. Memetics ties it all together
    to find out how divergent and sometimes antagonistic cultures develop the
    mass mentality of the group represented. How does a philosophy, culture,
    thought process develop?

            Anthropologists study culture and its evolution ... to me memetics
    is -- or should be -- the study of the way thought processes as defined by
    language and the interaction of that language is co-evolutionary for any
    specific culture.

            Bruce Jones

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 18:46:44 GMT