Re: What are memes made of?

From: Joe E. Dees (joedees@bellsouth.net)
Date: Thu Feb 17 2000 - 18:24:13 GMT

  • Next message: Richard Brodie: "RE: memetics-digest V1 #130"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA11133 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 17 Feb 2000 18:21:53 GMT
    Message-Id: <200002171816.NAA17224@mail5.lig.bellsouth.net>
    From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 12:24:13 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: What are memes made of?
    In-reply-to: <20000217124452.AAA6651@camail2.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.155]>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Subject: Re: What are memes made of?
    Date sent: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 07:39:13 -0500
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    > Raymond Recchia made this comment not too long ago --
    >
    > >There may be a lot that can be said about the differences between memes
    > >that require self-awareness and those that don't. But insisting on
    > >self-awareness strays from Dawkin's central theme of selfish yet unaware
    > >self-replicating entities.
    >
    > And such insistence begins to beg it's own non-parsimoniousness, perhaps,
    > especially if, (as I agree with the contention), cultural evolution is
    > only the perceived and thus pattern-inflicted result of a process, that
    > it is in all ways a behavioral adaptation, and that a 'meme' that
    > requires a 'difference' between entities that need self-awareness and
    > those that don't is no thing at all, but a catagory of behavioral states,
    > and, um, possibly somewhat useless to either discover or study, like
    > Dennett's incorrect calculator- the algorithm that didn't work, and thus,
    > while part of evolution, is not available at this point for us to study
    > at all.
    >
    Neither memes nor genes are self aware in themselves, and in this
    they are similar. One difference between them lies in the
    necessity for there to be self-aware, intentional and signifying
    people to create, mutate, transmit and receive memes; this
    restriction does not apply to genes.
    >
    > - Wade
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 17 2000 - 18:21:56 GMT