Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA11234 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 17 Feb 2000 18:54:40 GMT Subject: Re: What are memes made of? Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 13:53:07 -0500 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas est veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20000217185908.AAA3111@camail2.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On 02/17/00 13:24, Joe E. Dees said this-
>One difference between them lies in the
>necessity for there to be self-aware, intentional and signifying
>people to create, mutate, transmit and receive memes; this
>restriction does not apply to genes.
Even within my predilection for the socio-biologic in all of this, I see
Joe's definition of meme here as the only possible one in which to erect
any framework at all of study and analyzation. It is the utter
_impossibility_ of studying a meme if one considers birdsong a meme that
I am most insistent upon repeating. And I _like_ the idea of such things
as memes depending upon this state of consciousness.
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 17 2000 - 18:54:43 GMT