Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA23446 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 10 Feb 2000 20:17:26 GMT Message-Id: <200002102016.PAA16513@mail2.lig.bellsouth.net> From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net> To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 14:19:27 -0600 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable Subject: Re: More on what memes are made of In-reply-to: <00020918204600.00915@faichney> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b) Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
From:           	Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
Organization:   	Reborn Technology
To:             	memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Subject:        	Re: More on what memes are made of
Date sent:      	Wed, 9 Feb 2000 18:16:49 +0000
Send reply to:  	memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> On Wed, 09 Feb 2000, Joe E. Dees wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 03 Feb 2000, Wade T.Smith wrote:
> >> >>My point is that arrow, trajectory and system are all
> >> >>equally real.
> >> >
> >> >But if "meaning has [no] place in the foundations of memetics", then of 
> >> >what use is _reality_ in it?
> >> >
> >> >;-)
> >> 
> >> I'll ignore the emoticon just in case you're only half-joking.
> >> 
> >> The concept of reality belongs to the system we're using to examine the
> >> foundations of memetics, which I suppose we might loosely call "philosophy".
> >> 
> >Meaning has an essential place in the foundations of philosophy; 
> >one of its main branches (along with logic, epistemology and ontology) is 
> >axiology, or the theory of value (usually divided into ethics - theory 
> >of the good - and aesthetics - theory of the beautiful).  Logic itself 
> >has to do with the structures of true, false and meaningless 
> >statements.  I should know; I have a degree in the field.
> 
> Good for you, and so do I.  Unfortunately, it does not help me understand the
> relevance here of the place of meaning in philosophy.  Perhaps you'd be good
> enough to explicate your reasoning.
>
With what part of philosophy are you proposing to construct your 
"ontology", if not ontology itself?  Ontology is inextricably linked 
with epistemology, for our range of possible choices as to the 
explorable being or nature of that which we purport to study, and its 
relation(s) to contiguous objects is circumscribed by the scope of 
our possible knowing of it.  And what can be known of being but 
meaning? The per/conceptual interrelation between the intending 
mind and its object (which is in this case memetics) is prescriptive 
for the struction (structure/function) of both intender and object; this 
interrelation is as it is, and not in other ways, due to the nature of 
the polar relata (mind and object) perceptually and conceptually, 
that is, intentionally, interrelated, and thus the interrelation 
functions as a semiologic, serving to inform us as to the character 
of the relata so mediated.  This character is expressed 
semantically, i.e. in terms of what the object MEANS to the 
KNOWER of that meaning, what it MEANS to be (and be capable 
of being) a KNOWER of such a MEANT object, and what 
KNOWING itself can be said to MEAN when employed to relate 
such a KNOWER with such a KNOWN.  To deny the existence, 
reality or relevance of either intentionality (the intending) or the 
intender is tantamount to denying the same concerning the 
intended object, memetics, itself, for just as perceiver-perceiving-
perceived, conceiver-conceiving-conceived, knower-knowing-known, 
rememberer-remembering-remembered or imaginer-imagining-
imagined, intender-intending-intended is a tripartate structure built 
like a three-legged stool; remove any leg and the other two cannot 
stand.  Notice that also meaning is essential to such study, for 
there is no other basis upon which we may distinguish or 
differentiate our chosen object of study from any other; the 
discriminatory function which intentionality performs is both an 
existential and a hermeneutic one, (these - existential and 
hermeneutic - are the two main branches of phenomenology, by 
the way, and all ontology must be phenomenology, for all we can 
know of being is what appears to us and what we can deduce from 
that by means of logic) involving both thatness and whatness, both 
being and meaning, for from the co-primordial basis where the two 
are fused in presence, they diverge, but meaning, although from 
this point dependent upon being, nevertheless elaborates upon and 
characterizes that brute and meaningless (except for its presence 
to the observing subjectivity) being, and is the only modality 
capable of doing so.  Without including meaning, you lose all 
ability to either characterize the object of study (memetics) or 
differentiate it from other objects (and these two intentional 
functions are themselves complementary).  Since you profess to a 
philosophy degree, I'm sure you can understand these trenchant 
and undeniable methodological exigencies.
Main Entry: on·tol·o·gy
Pronunciation: än-'tä-l&-jE
Function: noun
Etymology: New Latin ontologia, from ont- + -logia -logy
Date: circa 1721
1 : a branch of metaphysics concerned with the nature and 
relations of being
2 : a particular theory about the nature of being or the kinds of 
existents
- on·tol·o·gist /-jist/ noun 
Main Entry: epis·te·mol·o·gy
Pronunciation: i-"pis-t&-'mä-l&-jE
Function: noun
Etymology: Greek epistEmE knowledge, from epistanai to 
understand, know, from epi- + histanai to cause to stand -- more at 
STAND
Date: circa 1856
: the study or a theory of the nature and grounds of knowledge 
especially with reference to its limits and validity
- epis·te·mo·log·i·cal /-m&-'lä-ji-k&l/ adjective
- epis·te·mo·log·i·cal·ly /-k(&-)lE/ adverb
- epis·te·mol·o·gist /-'mä-l&-jist/ noun 
> --
> Robin Faichney
> 
> 
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
> 
> 
===============================This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 10 2000 - 20:17:28 GMT