Re: What are memes made of?

From: William van den Heuvel (heuvel@muc.de)
Date: Wed Feb 09 2000 - 18:44:07 GMT

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: What are memes made of?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA20833 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 9 Feb 2000 18:45:24 GMT
    User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513)
    Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 19:44:07 +0100
    Subject: Re: What are memes made of?
    From: William van den Heuvel <heuvel@muc.de>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Message-ID: <B4C773C4.E6%heuvel@muc.de>
    In-Reply-To: <200002090221.VAA04860@mail2.lig.bellsouth.net>
    Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    William van den heuvel:
    >> If you like to think in terms of "stances" then you could say
    >> information as matter is the "physical stance", and information as
    >> data is the "formal stance". But now I am tempted to suggest the
    >> introduction of an additional stance; information as meaning, which
    >> would be the "meaning stance".

     
    Robin Faichney:
    > The "meaning stance" is a great idea, but it's already been had: this is
    > effectively the same as Dennett's "intentional stance" -- see his book of
    > that name.

    Unfortunately, I don't have much time to read books so I don't know if
    Dennett gives a special meaning to 'intention'. But going by the common
    usage of the word 'intention', I would be inclined to say that meaning comes
    prior to intention in the sense that the intention seems to flows out of the
    meaning. In my view, meaning implies significance, value and purpose all of
    which give rise to an intention. If that view is correct then intention
    would depend on meaning in which case the "meaning stance" comes prior to
    the "intentional stance".

    So, if you like to bring in the "intentional stance" it would have to follow
    the "meaning stance". Hence, we now have four stances:
    1.- the physical stance
    2.- the formal stance
    3.- the meaning stance
    4.- the intentional stance

    William van den Heuvel
    heuvel@muc.de

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 09 2000 - 18:45:26 GMT