Re: More on what memes are made of

From: Joe E. Dees (joedees@bellsouth.net)
Date: Thu Feb 03 2000 - 20:40:54 GMT

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: What are memes made of?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA06945 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 3 Feb 2000 20:39:03 GMT
    Message-Id: <200002032037.PAA28649@mail3.lig.bellsouth.net>
    From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 14:40:54 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: More on what memes are made of
    In-reply-to: <00020317453101.00465@faichney>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
    Organization: Reborn Technology
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: More on what memes are made of
    Date sent: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 17:37:38 +0000
    Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    > I'd snip some of this quotation, but it's highly relevant.
    >
    > On Thu, 03 Feb 2000,
    > Joe E. Dees wrote: >
    > >> On Wed, 02 Feb 2000, Joe E. Dees wrote:
    > >> >From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
    > >> >
    > >> >> It occurred to me that what I'm trying to say about physical information, genes
    > >> >> and memes could perhaps be made clearer by a little additional explanation on a
    > >> >> particular point.
    > >> >>
    > >> >> Some time ago I came to the conclusion that the trajectory of an arrow, for
    > >> >> instance, is just as real as the arrow itself. The trajectory is not
    > >> >> "substantial", but it is a pattern based in the material world, and if we
    > >> >> examine the arrow as closely as we can, down to the atomic and subatomic
    > >> >> levels, we find that in fact it's not very "substantial" either. We are, due
    > >> >> to evolution, somewhat better equipped to handle arrows than trajectories
    > >> >> (though in fact we're quite amazingly good at dealing with the latter -- watch
    > >> >> any ball game, or better still, play it, while mindful of trajectory plotting). But
    > >> >> that's no reason to view the arrow as "more real".
    > >> >>
    > >> >We're dealing in the macro realm, not the quantum, and therefore
    > >> >zen emptiness and the buddhist doctrine of the absence of inherent
    > >> >reality does not apply.
    > >>
    > >> Any zen teacher who knows little or nothing of QM would find that a *very*
    > >> strange claim. As I do myself, though perhaps for different reasons. If you're
    > >> refering to my examination of the arrow, that's hardly central to the argument.
    > >> From what you say below, you seem to agree that the trajectory is just as real
    > >> as the arrow, which is the point I'm trying to make there. So what's your
    > >> problem?
    > >>
    > >Zen teachers make more than a few strange claims themselves.
    > >You seem to be attempting to lay the groundwork for a
    > >reductionistic substitution of the trajectory alone for the (arrow +
    > >trajectory) system by asserting some sort of arrow unreality; that
    > >won't work.
    >
    > I do no such thing. My point is that arrow, trajectory and system are all
    > equally real. You're so keen to find fault, you misread what I write. I won't
    > waste my time with any of what followed this silliness.
    >
    An arrow is both more substantial (being, after all, composed of
    substance) and more real than a trajectory, which is dependent
    upon the arrow for its existence, and not vice-versa. A trajectory
    abstracted from its physical instantiation in arrowflight is an ideal
    (that's not real, Robin) cognitive construct; an nonflying arrow is a
    concrete real object. One cannot legitimately equate the ideal and
    the real.
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    >
    >
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 03 2000 - 20:39:04 GMT