Re: memetics-digest V1 #118

From: VANWYHE@aol.com
Date: Mon Jan 31 2000 - 18:24:04 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: memetics-digest V1 #118"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA23493 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 31 Jan 2000 18:24:29 GMT
    From: <VANWYHE@aol.com>
    Message-ID: <6d.e4bfdd.25c72d44@aol.com>
    Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 13:24:04 EST
    Subject: Re: memetics-digest V1 #118
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Mailer: AOL 4.0.i for Windows 95 sub 137
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Robert I think your subject a fascinating one but I think your conclusion
    needs more thought. "Higher levels of organization" is rather figurative
    language.
    I would be interested in seeing the physical stance followed up more
    carefully. I don't think the what "memes" actually are is often considered by
    those who talk about them. The confusion arises in the vagueness which
    persists about the relationship between brain information and artefacts.
    Artefacts don't reproduce themselves. They are like bird nests. Nests don't
    evolve- even though we might see change in a succession of nests- these
    changes do point to the evolution of the brain information responsible for
    their creation.
    Anyway, a little tid bit out of my own work there. Good luck with your essay.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 18:24:30 GMT