RE: Morphogenetic fields and memes

From: Scott Chase (hemidactylus@my-Deja.com)
Date: Mon Jan 24 2000 - 23:11:22 GMT

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re:Morphogenetic fields"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA08140 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 24 Jan 2000 23:12:14 GMT
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 15:11:22 -0800
    From: "Scott Chase" <hemidactylus@my-Deja.com>
    Message-ID: <EFHAKPCAHKGKGBAA@my-deja.com>
    X-Sent-Mail: off
    X-Mailer: MailCity Service
    Subject: RE: Morphogenetic fields and memes
    X-Sender-Ip: 209.240.197.14
    Organization: My Deja Email  (http://www.my-deja.com:80)
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Language: en
    Content-Length: 1443
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

     

    --
    

    On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 08:06:14 Bruce Jones wrote: >Kenneth: > >Evidentially not as new as some of us. > >Let me try to restate what you have stated/asked. > >Change is promulgated by a redefinition, refinement, and combination of old >with new. > >In other words.... A thought, philosophy, or cultural shift in what is >acceptable or deemed by the whole as required, is brought about by a >reexamination of what has been. Change is the natural and expected result >of social, environmental, predatory, and technological pressure. Therefore >any paradigm shift is a result of a mimetic shift. To believe and act today >as was believed and acted 50, 100, 500, 1000 years ago can not be done >because of 'evolutionary' shifts in thought, thought processes, ideologies, >and cultural advances. > >Is this what you asked/said? > > I notice you've avoided morphic resonance and formative causation. I believe Kenneth was introducing Rupert Sheldrake's ideas to us as something which may coincide with or be pertinent to memetics. This does not set very well with me. Should memetics embrace Sheldrake?

    Go to http://www.sheldrake.org and make up your own mind. Note though that the concept of morphogenetic fields is separable from Sheldrake's theoretical system and the baggage he adds.

    Have fun,

    Scott

    --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==-- Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 24 2000 - 23:12:15 GMT