From: "John C. 'Buck' Field" <info@fieldoperative.com>
To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: Internal meme?
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 13:24:55 -0500
In-Reply-To: <99100418352506.00322@faichney>
>>Yes it has. Is there any portion of this great length that you feel is
>relevant, and
>>if so, where is it and why does it relate?
>
>I'm afraid I don't like your tone.
This herring brings up a valid point: Perhaps more diplomatic phrasing would
encourage more productive dialogue. As I said before: my priority is knowledge,
therefore sometimes concern for popularity is eclipsed by a passion for learning. I
will try to give this failing more attention, and I apologize for treating you without
the sensitivity that anyone deserves.
>But I'm sure you're perfectly capable of
>finding your own way.
Your certainty may not be well founded ;^), but I would appreciate at least a clue
regarding what I should be looking for...
Would you Pretty-Please-With-Sugar-On-Top explain your criticism of my meme
definition?
--------------------------------------------
A ship in the harbor is safe, but that's not
what ships are for. Carpe Diem!
+++++++++++++++
Field Operative Services:
Database and Web Solutions
www.fieldoperative.com
--------------------------------------------
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit