From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Subject: RE: Internal meme?
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 18:33:51 +0100
Message-Id: <99100418352506.00322@faichney>
On Mon, 04 Oct 1999, John C. 'Buck' Field wrote:
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
>>Of Robin Faichney
>>Not many people around here would refer to the meme that way.
>
>Popularity is not the goal of my definition. Expanding my understanding=
is.
>
>>It is a very
>>loose usage which can work in some contexts, but not where memetics its=
elf is
>>the main topic of interest.
>
>Do you have an example where this definitions fails within a context of =
interest in
>memetics?
>
>>This has been discussed at great length quite recently. You should che=
ck the
>>archive.
>
>Yes it has. Is there any portion of this great length that you feel is =
relevant, and
>if so, where is it and why does it relate?
I'm afraid I don't like your tone. But I'm sure you're perfectly capable=
of
finding your own way.
-- Robin Faichney The Prime Source of MetaInformation -- http://www.conscious-machine.com=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit