RE: ply to Grant

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Feb 13 2002 - 23:12:36 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "Re: Words and Memes"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA19981 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 13 Feb 2002 23:18:09 GMT
    X-Originating-IP: [209.240.222.132]
    From: "Scott Chase" <ecphoric@hotmail.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: RE: ply to Grant
    Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 18:12:36 -0500
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
    Message-ID: <F214VOYbB2mBMUKUVyA00017d68@hotmail.com>
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Feb 2002 23:12:37.0006 (UTC) FILETIME=[ED030AE0:01C1B4E3]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >From: "Grant Callaghan" <grantc4@hotmail.com>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >Subject: RE: ply to Grant
    >Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:07:17 -0800
    >
    >>To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    >>Subject: RE: ply to Grant
    >>Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 00:54:59 -0500
    >>
    >>Hi Ray Recchia -
    >>
    >> >that conveniently allow him to justify the actions of an unjust
    >> >government.
    >>
    >>We all swim in this same river. Or we'd all be moving, all the time.
    >>
    >>No-one has a just government.
    >>
    >>We all justify quite a lot, daily living.
    >>
    >>- Wade
    >>
    >Governments don't do what they (the people who run them) think is just or
    >unjust. They do what is expedient based on the problems confronting them
    >at
    >the time. The most common problem for a politician is getting elected
    >again. It's the historians who decide after the fact that what they did
    >was
    >just or unjust. Jesus isn't around to run anyone's government and the
    >church he left behind is just as messed up as any other government.
    >They're
    >still carrying on the policies of Constantine some 1500 years later.
    >
    >
    >
    Expedience? Hmmm...

    Trying to unravel the details of the apparent collusion between France,
    Israel and Britain previous to the hostilities of the Suez war in 1956, I
    wonder how much pragmatics and expedience played a role.

    Supposedly a document came to light in 1996 that adds a little petrol to the
    fire (the Protocol of Sevres). The only scholarly journal article I've found
    so far is by Avi Shlaim.

    I guess the U.S. isn't the only imperialist nation in the world. We learned
    well from the masters.

    ref:

    Shlaim A. 1997. The Protocol of Sevres, 1956: anatomy of a war plot.
    International Affairs (73): 509-530

    _________________________________________________________________
    Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 13 2002 - 23:27:30 GMT