Re: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or

From: dgatherer@talk21.com
Date: Wed Feb 13 2002 - 10:53:23 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "An odd addition to the axis of evil"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id LAA18020 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:04:02 GMT
    From: <dgatherer@talk21.com>
    X-Mailer: talk21 v1.24 - http://talk21.btopenworld.com
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    X-Talk21Ref: none
    Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:53:23 GMT
    Subject: Re: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or
    Message-Id: <20020213105830.BYIU26290.wmpmta02-app.mail-store.com@wmpmtavirtual>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    meme

    Philip:
    Memes that can persuade the host to adopt will outdo the ones who are
    less adept in that.

    Derek:
    This is the biased transmission effect of Takahasi (1998, 1999), also referred to as 'cultural selection' by Cavalli-sforza and Feldman (1981). The problem is that it is often just a post hoc explanation. You can model biased transmission and get epidemic-like effects, ceteris paribus. However, showing biased transmission empirically is tricky.
    (there are a handful of reasonble examples)
      
    Philip:
    If the memes were generally too bad
    in the sense of killing off a large part of the human population for a long
    enough period the people with high skeptical barriers would flourish.

    Derek:
    Not necessarily. My own simulations indicate that even when a population of agents is maximally susceptible, the presence of a pool of cultural information to which they can refer, puts the brakes on any epidemic of disadvantageous memes. Contagion only really works well for advantageous memes.

    Philip:
    This has
    not happened yet, so people have low enough skeptical barriers for (evil)
    memes to overcome

    Derek:
    they probably do, but my own simulations indicate that any epidemic effects will be short lived and local. A lot of people have previously concluded that 'incomplete information' is an important factor in social contagion effects (see JoM reviews by Marsden and Frank, or Caginalp's work in J Psych Finan Markts). This effect is 'emergent' (hey-hey!) when simple contagious agents are allowed to play with each other in a virtual environment in which they either have cultural information or rely wholly on agent-to-agent transmission. I have a JoM paper under review on this, and all the above refs will be in it. (If it doesn't get accepted, I'll post the refs in a separate message).

    --------------------
    talk21 your FREE portable and private address on the net at http://www.talk21.com

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 13 2002 - 11:13:25 GMT