Re: Words and Memes

From: Philip Jonkers (philipjonkers@prodigy.net)
Date: Wed Feb 13 2002 - 04:16:18 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "Re: ality"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id DAA16929 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 13 Feb 2002 03:24:56 GMT
    Message-ID: <006001c1b445$33346760$5e2ffea9@oemcomputer>
    From: "Philip Jonkers" <philipjonkers@prodigy.net>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <20020210143712.44645.qmail@web12303.mail.yahoo.com> <003701c1b2b0$fa01e160$8086b2d1@teddace>
    Subject: Re: Words and Memes
    Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 19:16:18 -0900
    Organization: Prodigy Internet
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
    X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Ted:
    > I read the introduction to The Meme Machine after Philip posted it. I'm
    > well aware that she follows Dennett in denying the reality of the self.
    So
    > it's no wonder she fails to recognize the self-nature of memes. Blackmore
    > misses the main narrative of memetics, which concerns the shifting of
    > authority from human consciousness to the ideas we create. Ideas
    ordinarily
    > have no self-nature but replicate from mind to mind according to our
    > intentional interactions with each other. They become memes only when
    they
    > begin replicating under their own authority.

    As far as I know Blackmore only the denies the reality of the self as an
    inner homunculi or `soul'. She conceives the self as a (huge) collection of
    memes
    and calls it therefore appropriately the `self-plex'. In addition, if
    anything she
    does consider the self-nature of memes as she focusses on the interpretation
    of the meme's eye view in the Meme-Machine. She even does it
    to such extent that she leaves the impression of underrating the necessary
    mechanism of memes having to persuade the hosts for adoption.

    Perhaps you might want to read her book in full Ted, you may find that it is
    more on a par with your view than you currently believe.

    Philip.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 13 2002 - 03:34:24 GMT