Re: Words and memes

From: Joe Dees (joedees@addall.com)
Date: Tue Feb 12 2002 - 09:17:09 GMT

  • Next message: AaronLynch@aol.com: "Re: Memes Meta-Memes and Politics 1 of 3 (1988, updates 2002)"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id JAA13810 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:22:48 GMT
    Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 01:17:09 -0800
    Message-Id: <200202120917.g1C9H9ww030157@mail25.bigmailbox.com>
    X-Authentication-Warning: mail25.bigmailbox.com: www set sender to joedees@addall.com using -f
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Content-Disposition: inline
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
    X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.116)
    X-Originating-Ip: [65.80.162.88]
    From: "Joe Dees" <joedees@addall.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Words and memes
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)

    > "Dace" <edace@earthlink.net> <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Re: Words and memesDate: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 09:07:42 -0800
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >
    >
    >
    >> >> Hi Ted
    >> >> Good points. What if 'meme' is simply a word signifying a strand
    >> >> of cultural information which resides in cultural artefacts (even a
    >> >> hammer) which enables the replication of the culture?
    >> >> Jeremy
    >> >
    >> >We've been dealing with this on the Abstractism thread. My view is
    >> >that information is not a property of matter. We can have a chemist
    >> >examine a hammer and report back on all its properties. The property
    >> >of "hammerness" will not be among them. Neither its shape nor its
    >> >potential uses make it a hammer but only our interpretation of it when
    >> >see it or use it. Cultural artifacts can help spread memes, but the
    >> >memes themselves are in our minds.
    >> >
    >> >Ted
    >> >
    >> As a journeyman boat-builder I would comment that, regardless of the
    >> chemists report, all experienced woodworkers would, after examining
    >> the hammer, not only report that the hammer was a hammer but what
    >> kind, its quality, its specific uses, and a raft of other information.
    >> Even in Platonic parallels, if I find an ancient rusted hammer its
    >> 'hammerness' will call to the perfect hammer that I have in my mind.
    >> Jeremy
    >
    >Right. That's my point. It's a hammer only in the mind of the individuals
    >for whom it corresponds to the abstract idea of "hammer." You don't have to
    >be an experienced woodworker to know when an object fits this category.
    >
    A rock can become a hammer for me, when I define it as one and use it as such.
    >
    >Ted
    >
    >
    >
    >===============================================================
    >This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL!
    http://www.addall.com compares book price at 41 online stores.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 12 2002 - 09:38:24 GMT