Re: Memes Meta-Memes and Politics 1 of 3 (1988, updates 2002)

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Feb 12 2002 - 06:21:47 GMT

  • Next message: Joe Dees: "Re: Why memeoids?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id GAA13099 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 12 Feb 2002 06:27:24 GMT
    X-Originating-IP: [209.240.222.132]
    From: "Scott Chase" <ecphoric@hotmail.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Memes Meta-Memes and Politics 1 of 3 (1988, updates 2002)
    Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 01:21:47 -0500
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
    Message-ID: <F307JVBFdAhTIdamYHO0001dbfa@hotmail.com>
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Feb 2002 06:21:47.0519 (UTC) FILETIME=[8CB000F0:01C1B38D]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >From: <AaronLynch@aol.com>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >Subject: Re: Memes Meta-Memes and Politics 1 of 3 (1988, updates 2002)
    >Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 00:47:03 EST
    >
    >In a message dated 2/11/2002 10:55:04 PM Central Standard Time, Scott Chase
    ><ecphoric@hotmail.com> writes:
    >
    > > Nope. I'd like to give Cloak a serious gander, but I'd appeciate if
    >someone
    > > would give Julian Huxley's stuff on "noogenetics" a look for its
    >putative
    > > proto-memetic bases? I'm still hung up on his use of a term like
    > > "self-reproduction" or "self-reproducing" and how this usage ties into
    >what
    > > he says about mentifacts (and artifacts and socifacts) and noosystems.
    > > Huxley's essays found in _Knowledge, Morality and Destiny_ (1957. A
    >Mentor
    > > Book. New American Library. New York) are "Man's place and role in
    >nature"
    > > based on a paper from 1954 and published in 1955. His essay "Evolution,
    > > cultural and biological" was published in 1955. These dates come from
    > > footnotes in his book.
    >
    >Thanks, Scott.
    >
    >This sounds interesting. Could you quote for us some of Huxley's material
    >that would count as evolutionary cultural replicator theory, or that is the
    >most suggestive of such theory?
    >
    Check out my recent posts re: noogenetics vs. memetics. There are some
    quotes in those posts.

    In short, he talks about cultural evolution and the self-reproduction of
    mental products. You saw those posts didn't you? His book with alternative
    titles _Knowledge, Morality, & Destiny_ and _New Bottles for New Wine_ can
    probably be found in a university or possibly a public library.

    _________________________________________________________________
    Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 12 2002 - 06:44:55 GMT