Re: Words and memes

From: Keith Henson (hkhenson@cogeco.ca)
Date: Sat Feb 09 2002 - 18:54:19 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Meta-memes?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA03433 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 9 Feb 2002 18:57:42 GMT
    Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020209135324.03565890@pop.cogeco.ca>
    X-Sender: hkhenson@pop.cogeco.ca
    X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
    Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 13:54:19 -0500
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: Keith Henson <hkhenson@cogeco.ca>
    Subject: Re: Words and memes
    In-Reply-To: <001f01c1b192$d8bd22e0$5e2ffea9@oemcomputer>
    References: <002001c1aff4$20a2b660$3e03aace@oemcomputer> <5.1.0.14.0.20020201203643.03556980@pop.cogeco.ca> <5.0.2.1.0.20020207185313.00a34ea0@mail.clarityconnect.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020209023730.0355b2f0@pop.cogeco.ca>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    At 08:54 AM 09/02/02 -0900, "Philip Jonkers" <philipjonkers@prodigy.net>
      wrote:
    >Keith:
    > > The whole article is 30k and I my thinking has moved on from some of the
    > > things I said in that article. Still, if there is no objection I may post
    > > it in 3-4 pieces.
    >
    >No objection from my side. But perhaps you can modify it a little so that is
    >more compatible with your current views.

    I don't like to mess with something that old, but I could interline
    comments where my thinking has evolved.

    Keith

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 09 2002 - 19:24:44 GMT