Re: Words and memes

From: Wade Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Fri Feb 08 2002 - 15:48:28 GMT

  • Next message: Wade Smith: "Re: Words and memes" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA29935 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 8 Feb 2002 15:54:30 GMT
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:48:28 -0500
Subject: Re: Words and memes
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
From: Wade Smith <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <1198941466-5196680@smtp.clarityconnect.com>
Message-Id: <4BB29F34-1CAB-11D6-9398-003065A0F24C@harvard.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480)
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    On Friday, February 8, 2002, at 10:12 ,
    <rrecchia@mail.clarityconnect.com> wrote:

    > I don't have a problem with people voicing their political or religious
    > views. I do have a problem with using memetics to justify them.

    Is memetics a valid justification for anything?

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 08 2002 - 16:10:08 GMT