Re: Words and memes

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Thu Feb 07 2002 - 12:47:37 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE:"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA24971 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 7 Feb 2002 12:53:03 GMT
    Subject: Re: Words and memes
    Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 07:47:37 -0500
    x-sender: wsmith1@camail.harvard.edu
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-Id: <20020207124724.53D881FD47@camail.harvard.edu>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Hi Joe Dees -

    Sometimes, truthfully, you bring tears to my eyes.

    - Wade

    >Here you are, quite simply, wrong. Whatever reality is, it must include
    >our primordial and apodictic experience. Our augmented perceptions have
    >informed us concerning the structure of these material objects, and the
    >fact that they are composed of molecules, which are themselves composed of
    >atoms, that are composed on one level of protons, neutrons and electrons,
    >and on a deeper level of quarks, leptons and gluons, with much empty space
    >between, but that is not to deny the reality we existentially and
    >phenomenologically experience, but to further define it. Our experiences
    >are subjective, but our common experiences are intersubjective, and
    >massive intersubjective agreement, such as occurs in the sciences,
    >apodictically approaches objectivity, and its objects are not only real,
    >but experimentally possess certain real attributes. What we may discover
    >in the future concerning the constitution of physical objects will not
    >overthrow atomic and nuclear views, but extend, deepen and elaborate upon
    >them. Since much of our technology is designed and built upon the
    >exploitation of these structural underpinnings and their various
    >properties, if they were fallacious, we could not be doing with them what
    >we are doing here/now, i.e. communication with each other by virtue of them.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 13:19:15 GMT