Re: Fw: sex and the single meme

From: Philip Jonkers (philipjonkers@prodigy.net)
Date: Wed Feb 06 2002 - 02:36:54 GMT

  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: Meme bonding"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id BAA18111 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 6 Feb 2002 01:45:21 GMT
    Message-ID: <003c01c1aeb7$24d26160$5e2ffea9@oemcomputer>
    From: "Philip Jonkers" <philipjonkers@prodigy.net>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <59716B92-13FE-11D6-8CCE-003065A0F24C@harvard.edu>
    Subject: Re: Fw: sex and the single meme
    Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 17:36:54 -0900
    Organization: Prodigy Internet
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
    X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Philip:
    > >> Could you give me a (behaviorist) definition of what
    > >> you consider a meme.

    Wade:
    > Memes are behaviors of culture that are replicated, in some
    > fashion, after perception, by another.
    >
    > They are external activities. Artefacts are products of memes.
    > Spoor, if you will. Written passages are products of memes.
    >
    > And that's it.
    >
    > And it's _not_ a behaviorist definition at all. It's a
    > definition that attempts to isolate the meme to its only
    > _verifiable_ and _studiable_ location.
    >
    > Thus, we don't talk, memetically, about what Picasso _could_
    > have done, we talk about what he did.
    >
    > We don't drive the parts of the car or the processes of
    > manufacturing in the factory, we drive the car produced by the
    > these things.
    >
    > We don't put our cereal in the clay on the potter's wheel, we
    > put it in the finished product fired in the kiln- and we can't
    > analyze or 'see' memes in the brain, or use them, in the same
    > way, although we can see the processes and the parts, or we will
    > be able to, with more and increased fMRI and other studies.
    >
    > It is a practical, locational, definition, separate from
    > instinctual or autonomic behaviors, although, yes, instinct is
    > also a process in the meme factory.

    Okay, fair enough. However, I can't see why instinct has anything to do
    with meme-processing. If instinct was that important wouldn't more
    animals have developed a culture too?

    Philip.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 06 2002 - 01:54:14 GMT