Re: necessity of mental memes

From: AaronLynch@aol.com
Date: Thu Jan 31 2002 - 17:47:40 GMT

  • Next message: Keith Henson: "re: necessity of mental memes"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA05333 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:53:38 GMT
    From: <AaronLynch@aol.com>
    Message-ID: <35.216278b4.298add3c@aol.com>
    Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:47:40 EST
    Subject: Re: necessity of mental memes
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 113
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    In a message dated 1/31/2002 7:42:06 AM Central Standard Time, Wade T.Smith
    <wade_smith@harvard.edu> writes:

    > Hi dgatherer@talk21.com -
    >
    > >"Dr Tony Baloney".
    >
    > I'm the one who questioned the identity of what I thought was an obvious
    > joke, and from all evidence now received (that is, no follow up), it is a
    > blatant pseudonym.
    >
    > And I'm sorry, but, when I see something like 'Tony Baloney'- that's
    > precisely what I think it is- baloney.
    >
    > In this case, I appear to be right, but, I'll certainly declare my
    > questioning the validity of a name like that is not only correct, but
    > just and ethical.
    >
    > - Wade

    Hi Wade.

    Because Dr. Baloney was essentially inviting us to consider the name phony,
    you were able to question his identity without making an allegation and
    without provoking an angry, ugly argument. But if the same person had been
    acting more deceptively, he would have chosen some name other than "Baloney."
    In that case, there would have been a real problem to you calling his name
    and identity into question. If you knew who was really making the posts, you
    also could not make an allegation against the person posting under their
    legal name without causing major problems. In a sense, deception has a free
    hand while authenticity has its hands tied.

    Now all of this is not to say that pseudonyms, pen names, and screen names do
    not have their legitimate uses. Consider "Mark Twain," for instance. Dr.
    Baloney, for instance, was probably using that pseudonym to call honest
    attention to things he considered phony. The reasons that people use
    pseudonyms range from benign exposition to extreme treachery.

    --Aaron Lynch

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 18:02:13 GMT