RE: Abstractism

From: Price, Ilfryn (I.Price@shu.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Jan 28 2002 - 16:18:43 GMT

Next message: salice@gmx.net: "Re: sex and the single meme"

Previous message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Do all memes die out or evolve? I think not."
Maybe in reply to: Dace: "Abstractism"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA04345 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 28 Jan 2002 16:24:44 GMT
Message-ID: <C4C20D0AEF0BF84B90CFEA0105EEB0BD29ADD2@selene.shu.ac.uk>
From: "Price, Ilfryn" <I.Price@shu.ac.uk>
To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: Abstractism
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 16:18:43 -0000
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

> From: Grant Callaghan [mailto:grantc4@hotmail.com]
SNIP
> I'm rapidly approaching the conclusion that no two people can
> agree on what
> the term "meme" refers to.

Which helps the 'meme' replicate. I understand there is research in press (Wheeler) which identifies 9 different communities of scientists
using variations in their interpretatation of 'gene'. Signifiers get replicated but do not have to show fidelity of 'signified' (as I have
asserted before)

===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

Next message: salice@gmx.net: "Re: sex and the single meme"
Previous message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Do all memes die out or evolve? I think not."
Maybe in reply to: Dace: "Abstractism"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 28 2002 - 16:58:02 GMT