Re: sex and the single meme

From: salice@gmx.net
Date: Mon Jan 28 2002 - 14:42:05 GMT

  • Next message: Wade Smith: "Re: Fw: sex and the single meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA04099 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:48:11 GMT
    From: <salice@gmx.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 15:42:05 +0100
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: sex and the single meme
    Message-ID: <3C55714D.14344.821EB1@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020127121532.02c59090@pop.cogeco.ca>
    References: <3C533158.8424.4352F6@localhost>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 27 Jan 2002, at 12:45, Keith Henson wrote:

    > It is actually remarkable simple. As Hamilton said one time, he should be
    > willing to die if it would save more than 2 brothers or more than 8
    > cousins. If you understand that a brother carries half your genes and a
    > cousin one eighth of your genes it is obvious math to see that genes
    > favoring this level of sacrifice would be favored over the long term.

    Hm, but what about those family fathers who murder their whole
    family and commit suicide afterwards?

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 28 2002 - 15:05:42 GMT