Re: sex and the single meme

From: Joe Dees (joedees@addall.com)
Date: Mon Jan 28 2002 - 08:13:33 GMT

  • Next message: Joe Dees: "Re: Rogue Males by Lionel Tiger"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id IAA03163 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 28 Jan 2002 08:17:50 GMT
    Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 00:13:33 -0800
    Message-Id: <200201280813.g0S8DXJ29144@mail21.bigmailbox.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Content-Disposition: inline
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
    X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.116)
    X-Originating-Ip: [65.80.160.154]
    From: "Joe Dees" <joedees@addall.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: sex and the single meme
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)

    >Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 12:45:30 -0500
    > memetics@mmu.ac.uk Keith Henson <hkhenson@cogeco.ca> Re: sex and the single memeReply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >
    >At 10:44 PM 26/01/02 +0100, you wrote:
    >>On 26 Jan 2002, at 13:43, Keith Henson wrote:
    >>
    >> > That's too wide a net to cast. A gene that benefits the entire species
    >> > does not have any feedback to spread. The math for it to spread means it
    >> > must save more copies of itself than are lost.
    >>
    >>Well it's quite complex indeed. It's just a thought anyway, cause i
    >>can't explain myself how suicide memes come about cause i don't
    >>really believe in the memes-hijack-us thought.
    >
    >It is actually remarkable simple. As Hamilton said one time, he should be
    >willing to die if it would save more than 2 brothers or more than 8
    >cousins. If you understand that a brother carries half your genes and a
    >cousin one eighth of your genes it is obvious math to see that genes
    >favoring this level of sacrifice would be favored over the long term.
    >
    >> > You are getting close to the models constructed by the late William
    >> > Hamilton (Dawkins cites him a lot.)
    >>
    >>Hm, never heard of him. Going to do some readup.
    >
    >I would say so. Try here for a
    >start: http://www.unifr.ch/biol/ecology/hamilton/hamilton.html

    You'd probably like Robert Trivers, too.

    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL!
    http://www.addall.com compares book price at 41 online stores.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 28 2002 - 08:37:43 GMT