Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id GAA02926 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 28 Jan 2002 06:55:15 GMT X-Sender: unicorn@pop.greenepa.net Message-Id: <p04320404b87a7a4c7d4d@[192.168.2.3]> In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20020127112404.01c31b60@mail.iinet.net.au> References: <4.2.0.58.20020126133404.01d2f030@mail.iinet.net.au> <4.2.0.58.20020126133404.01d2f030@mail.iinet.net.au> <4.2.0.58.20020127112404.01c31b60@mail.iinet.net.au> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 01:51:29 -0500 To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk From: "Francesca S. Alcorn" <unicorn@greenepa.net> Subject: Re: Rogue Males by Lionel Tiger Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
stephen said:
>Female sexuality has to be inferred. It cannot be gotten directly
>through questioning or any other means, irrespective of whether the
>questioner is a man or a woman. Ask a woman what she likes, and her
>answers could mean just about anything.
Except of course, what she *actually* said. You *are* hopeless. :)
I have no doubt that there is a dark side to the female gender/sex
role, there is a dark side to everything. But your obsession with
this, coupled with your refusal to even admit the dark side of other
social structures (for instance Islam, and women's oppression under
it) hardly seems evenhanded.
And may the force be with you.
frankie
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 28 2002 - 07:35:34 GMT