Re: sex and the single meme

From: Wade T. Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Fri Jan 25 2002 - 22:03:52 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "Re: sex and the single meme" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA26721 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 25 Jan 2002 22:08:09 GMT
Message-Id: <200201252203.g0PM3kB03231@terri.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: sex and the single meme
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 17:03:52 -0500
x-sender: wsmith1@camail.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T. Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    Hi Scott Chase -

    >Are there other cases
    >where numerically limited subsets of humans have broken off and had
    >higher/lower prevalence of genetically base traits contrasted to the
    >parental population due to drift?

    Besides royal families and rampant idiocy, not to mention ugliness, and,
    oh yeah, hemophilia?

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 25 2002 - 22:21:58 GMT