Re: Abstractism

From: Philip Jonkers (philipjonkers@prodigy.net)
Date: Thu Jan 24 2002 - 09:04:30 GMT

  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: The Baseball Test Case"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id IAA22088 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 24 Jan 2002 08:11:44 GMT
    Message-ID: <01cc01c1a4b6$22e1a1a0$6621aace@oemcomputer>
    From: "Philip Jonkers" <philipjonkers@prodigy.net>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <AA-1A04C7B4EE944C7668FBC1D84F18EF95-ZZ@maillink1.prodigy.net> <00af01c1a479$ac039ac0$aa86b2d1@teddace>
    Subject: Re: Abstractism
    Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:04:30 -0900
    Organization: Prodigy Internet
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    > Philip:
    >
    > > >I do not question at all the possibility that memes, ideas,
    > > >whatever, can influence people. I'm influenced by viewing a stand of
    > > >old growth trees very substantially (I'm a forester), and I would be
    > > >foolish to doubt that ideas can influence people. What I doubt is that
    > > >the meme, or old growth stand, or whatevery, wants to influence me.
    > >
    > > I agree, the meme clearly doesn't want anything.
    > > It's an abstract entity
    >
    > In other words, it doesn't exist.
    >
    > > with no will.
    >
    > Of course. How could it have will if it doesn't exist in the first place?
    >
    > To be real a thing must exist whether or not we believe in it. An
    > abstraction, by definition, is a product of consciousness. It cannot
    exist
    > unless we imagine it-- precisely the opposite of the ontological
    criterion.
    >
    > If memes are abstractions, then we're just playing games here, fiddling
    with
    > words and imagining we've discovered something.

    Okay, bad sequence of words I admit. I should have stated:
    The meme is an entity that would best be described abstractly. If you
    assume, like
    I do, that memes define culture there would be no culture if I were to
    maintain that
    they exist only in an abstract way. This would be in contradiction with
    reality as there
    obviously is a thing like culture. Thanks Ted for pointing me out to this
    error of logic.

    Philip.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 24 2002 - 08:26:51 GMT