Re: Scientology

From: Keith Henson (hkhenson@cogeco.ca)
Date: Thu Jan 24 2002 - 06:57:29 GMT

  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: sex and the single meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id HAA21847 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 24 Jan 2002 07:00:04 GMT
    Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020124014157.0352f2b0@pop.cogeco.ca>
    X-Sender: hkhenson@pop.cogeco.ca
    X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
    Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 01:57:29 -0500
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: Keith Henson <hkhenson@cogeco.ca>
    Subject: Re: Scientology
    In-Reply-To: <00f701c1a482$81889440$aa86b2d1@teddace>
    References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020121013659.035280b0@pop.cogeco.ca> <5.1.0.14.0.20020122195748.03522ec0@pop.cogeco.ca>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    At 06:54 PM 23/01/02 -0800, "Dace" <edace@earthlink.net>
      wrote:
    >Keith:

    snip

    > > easy to find. Grady has been very low profile for years and they are
    > > still after him.
    >
    >What exactly does this mean? Are they harassing him in some way? Death
    >threats? Stalking? And if so, can't he get the police involved and bring
    >charges against them? Or is it legal harassment?

    Mostly legal harassement, going after his employers, legal stalking (using PIs)

    >[switching threads]
    >
    > > >if i understand Susan Blackmore's book correctly, then she believes
    > > >we have no choice whatsoever.
    >
    > > Susan is *technically* right on this point. It is the direct consequence
    > > of the fact that everything is either directly caused by something else
    > > or the result of a random event.
    >
    >This would seem to render moot your whole case against Scientology. If we
    >have no freedom to begin with, how could a cult steal it?

    Sigh. I don't know why I get into these discussions. If you can imagine
    getting outside our 3 space and one time dimension it is obvious. If you
    can't it is like trying to describe 3D to Flatlanders. I am not the best
    person to describe the situation in any case. Look up what some of the
    heavy science thinkers say about this topic. I might try to answer Joe
    Dees or maybe not.

    > > So you can look back and state with confidence that everything that
    > > happened including any memes you picked up were either caused or
    > > random. You can even say that the future is the same way. But it
    > > makes no difference in the operation sense because you will always
    > > feel you have choice.
    >
    >Exactly. The central theme of Scientology is freedom. This past summer
    >they had a bunch of evening concerts, and they always seemed to be singing
    >about the glories of freedom. It's that perfect reality reversal that makes
    >cults and clinical narcissists so creepy. But if your argument is correct,
    >all of us are victims of a cult, specifically the cult of the brain, which,
    >for reasons of natural selection, makes us believe we have free will.
    >
    >It's difficult to understand, given your belief in universal mind-control,
    >why you're at war with the Church of Scientology.

    They offend me.

    Keith Henson
    PS. In Robert Heinlein's story Starman Jones there is a character who is
    killed on a remote planet. In the story his grave marker reads:

    Sergeant Anderson, late of the Imperial Marines.
    "He ate what was set before him."

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 24 2002 - 07:44:26 GMT