Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA20807 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:31:22 GMT Message-Id: <200201240027.g0O0QxS20992@sherri.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: Selfish memes? Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 19:27:05 -0500 x-sender: wsmith1@camail.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T. Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Hi Robin Faichney -
>Sorry, Lawrence, I've been trying for a while to remember where I saw or
>heard that, without success, though I'm very confident he did write or
>say it.
This is apparently from The Selfish Gene, somewhere...
"Of course," Dawkins writes, "the personification of the gene is not to
be taken literally ... Personification is sometimes a useful device, and
for critics to accuse us of taking it literally is almost as stupid as
taking it literally in the first place. Physicists are not literally
charmed by their particles and the critic who would so accuse them is a
tiresome pedant."
- since it was mentioned in a review of the same at
http://www.salon.com/21st/books/1998/12/22books2.html
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 24 2002 - 00:39:21 GMT