Re: Recursive def. of the meme

From: salice@gmx.net
Date: Wed Jan 23 2002 - 12:20:26 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Selfish memes?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA19265 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:26:13 GMT
    From: <salice@gmx.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:20:26 +0100
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Recursive def. of the meme
    Message-ID: <3C4EB89A.24479.53A341@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <200201230453.g0N4r3x25216@mail15.bigmailbox.com>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 22 Jan 2002, at 20:53, Joe Dees wrote:

    > Nope. Genes are obviously copiable; it happens every day.
    > They are also obviously not memes.

    Not so obvious i'd say. With genetic development at hand, genetic
    information becomes valuable, copyable by humans, and part of a
    small set of cultural environment.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 23 2002 - 12:34:07 GMT