Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA19265 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:26:13 GMT From: <salice@gmx.net> To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:20:26 +0100 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: Recursive def. of the meme Message-ID: <3C4EB89A.24479.53A341@localhost> In-reply-to: <200201230453.g0N4r3x25216@mail15.bigmailbox.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On 22 Jan 2002, at 20:53, Joe Dees wrote:
> Nope. Genes are obviously copiable; it happens every day.
> They are also obviously not memes.
Not so obvious i'd say. With genetic development at hand, genetic
information becomes valuable, copyable by humans, and part of a
small set of cultural environment.
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 23 2002 - 12:34:07 GMT