RE: Recursive def. of the meme

From: Philip Jonkers (PHILIPJONKERS@prodigy.net)
Date: Wed Jan 23 2002 - 05:31:48 GMT

Next message: Dace: "Re: sex and the single meme"

Previous message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: Recursive def. of the meme"
Maybe in reply to: Philip Jonkers: "Recursive def. of the meme"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id FAA18434 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 23 Jan 2002 05:35:39 GMT
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Message-Id: <AA-F4BED858767C937F14E392D0BC341D4C-ZZ@homebase1.prodigy.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 00:31:48 -0500
From: "Philip Jonkers" <PHILIPJONKERS@prodigy.net>
Subject: RE: Recursive def. of the meme
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

Joe:
>Single letters and numbers of the alphanumeric system
would be foundational for written language, phonemes
would be foundational for spoken discourse, and basic
shapes and chemical elements would be foundational for
technology.

So there you go, you've just identified three
atomic meme levels.

Philip.

===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

Next message: Dace: "Re: sex and the single meme"
Previous message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: Recursive def. of the meme"
Maybe in reply to: Philip Jonkers: "Recursive def. of the meme"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 23 2002 - 05:50:35 GMT