Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception

From: Joe Dees (joedees@addall.com)
Date: Tue Jan 22 2002 - 03:49:59 GMT

  • Next message: Grant Callaghan: "Re: Scientology"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id DAA15195 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 22 Jan 2002 03:54:22 GMT
    Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 19:49:59 -0800
    Message-Id: <200201220349.g0M3nxE27665@mail9.bigmailbox.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Content-Disposition: inline
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
    X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.116)
    X-Originating-Ip: [65.80.47.144]
    From: "Joe Dees" <joedees@addall.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)

    >Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 22:17:18 -0500
    > Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception "Wade T. Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> memetics@mmu.ac.ukReply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >
    >On Sunday, January 20, 2002, at 09:40 , Joe Dees wrote:
    >
    >> It is entirely inappropriate to equate ant pheromones with human
    >> language; in fact, this may be the poster child for the term 'bad
    >> analogy'.
    >
    >I wasn't enraptured with it. Incomplete, at best.
    >
    >I was more attaching culture to it, though.
    >
    >> And unless a meme
    >> is out there, it is nowhere.
    >>
    >> Then there can be no new ideas, because they would have to be conceived
    >> before thay could be transmitted.
    >
    >Well, maybe I'm being mystical, but I would not say there are no new
    >ideas, just no new ideas _only in the head_. One has to express it. And
    >in the expression, the new idea happens.
    >
    >Talk away to yourself as much as you like, and consider that a new idea,
    >and indeed, I'm sure cities have been leveled in the minds of many, but
    >there is no expression, and thus, no meme, until and only until
    >transmission is attempted.
    >
    >The act itself is part of the whole, and the meme is not there without
    >the act.
    >
    The meme is not there without its conception or ideation; there is no meaning to be found in the world apart from the sinngebung (meaning-giving) capacity of memetic beings, in the sense that in the absence of the humans who create, transmit, receive, mutate, comprehend and apprehend meaning, nothing would mean anything. Even artifacts are meaningful not in isolation, but only inasmuch as they interface with an understanding intellect in which they may enable meaning to inhere.
    >
    >- Wade
    >
    >
    >===============================================================
    >This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL!
    http://www.addall.com compares book price at 41 online stores.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 22 2002 - 04:02:38 GMT