Re: The necessity of mental memes

From: Philip Jonkers (PHILIPJONKERS@prodigy.net)
Date: Mon Jan 21 2002 - 05:26:36 GMT

Next message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: The necessity of mental memes"

Previous message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: sex and the single meme"
Maybe in reply to: Joe Dees: "The necessity of mental memes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id FAA12245 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 21 Jan 2002 05:30:28 GMT
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Message-Id: <AA-CB74CD30692110B1AB18F374B6757300-ZZ@homebase1.prodigy.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:26:36 -0500
From: "Philip Jonkers" <PHILIPJONKERS@prodigy.net>
Subject: Re: The necessity of mental memes
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

Ted:
>While it's true that no one has ever found a meme in
the brain, no one has
>ever found a thought or a feeling or a memory or a
perception or a desire or
>any other mental function in the brain. Clearly,
memes exist in minds. The
>problem is trying to reduce mind to brain.

The Great Challenge of neuroscience indeed...

Philip.

===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

Next message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: The necessity of mental memes"
Previous message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: sex and the single meme"
Maybe in reply to: Joe Dees: "The necessity of mental memes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 21 2002 - 05:38:45 GMT