Re: Sensory and sensibility

From: Joe Dees (joedees@addall.com)
Date: Mon Jan 21 2002 - 04:29:46 GMT

  • Next message: Joe Dees: "Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception"
  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: CRASH CONTAGION"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id EAA12090 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 21 Jan 2002 04:34:09 GMT
    Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 20:29:46 -0800
    Message-Id: <200201210429.g0L4Tkp03703@mail3.bigmailbox.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Content-Disposition: inline
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
    X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.116)
    X-Originating-Ip: [66.156.194.69]
    From: "Joe Dees" <joedees@addall.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Sensory and sensibility
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)

    > memetics@mmu.ac.ukDate: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 20:49:10 -0500
    > "Philip Jonkers" <PHILIPJONKERS@prodigy.net> Re: Sensory and sensibilityReply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >
    >Grant:
    >>Making sounds that sound like words and using words
    >are not the same thin=
    >>g. =20
    >>When I beat my chest I am not communicating with
    >gorillas. Birds can be=20
    >>taught to repeat certain sounds to please their
    >trainers, but I seriously=
    >>=20
    >>doubt they are consciously communicating meaning with
    >their sounds. They=
    >>=20
    >>have just learned that making some sounds will cause
    >people to reward the=
    >>m=20
    >>with food or attention. I don't believe they are
    >really "saying" anythin=
    >>g.
    >
    >Pavlov has shown in the early 1900s that you can
    >condition animals to associate behavior with certain
    >human cues: the famous rinkle-bell-for-dinner-dog
    >experiment. If you have conditioned a kennel of
    >dependent dogs that way and you rinkle the bell
    >at dinner time, the dogs will perk up and expect
    >food by starting drewling.
    >
    >Ergo, this is a typical example of
    >communication (albeit interspecific).
    >
    In fact, in a sadistic experiment that will probably never be repeated on ethical grounds, it was proven that animals can be conditioned to respond positively to negative stimuli, by feeding them after burning them. Dogs would salivate after having a flaring match touched to their noses.
    >
    >Philip.
    >
    >
    >
    >===============================================================
    >This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL!
    http://www.addall.com compares book price at 41 online stores.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 21 2002 - 04:47:23 GMT