Re: Sensory and sensibility

From: Philip Jonkers (PHILIPJONKERS@prodigy.net)
Date: Mon Jan 21 2002 - 00:16:06 GMT

  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: Sensory and sensibility and a big question"
  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: Scientology" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA11121 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:19:58 GMT
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Message-Id: <AA-28F91642FCE6E36A633883E5F2BE6481-ZZ@homebase1.prodigy.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:16:06 -0500
From: "Philip Jonkers" <PHILIPJONKERS@prodigy.net>
Subject: Re: Sensory and sensibility
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    --- Original Message ---
    From: "Francesca S. Alcorn" <unicorn@greenepa.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Sensory and sensibility

    >Salice said:
    >
    >
    >> > Some developmental types suggest the 'self' is
    not intact until somewhere
    >>> in the fourth year.
    >>
    >>Is the 'self' required for memetic processes?
    >
    >No, but perhaps the same thing that gives rise to
    memes also gives
    >rise to a our idea of self: the ability to create an
    abstract
    >representation of something in our mind.

    Exactly... and is has a name too: the self-plex.
    See The Meme-Machine.

    Philip.
     

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 21 2002 - 00:39:51 GMT