Re: The necessity of mental memes

From: Philip Jonkers (PHILIPJONKERS@prodigy.net)
Date: Sun Jan 20 2002 - 23:12:33 GMT

Next message: Dace: "Re: Scientology 2/2"

Previous message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: A Confusing Example"
Maybe in reply to: Joe Dees: "The necessity of mental memes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA10804 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 20 Jan 2002 23:16:23 GMT
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Message-Id: <AA-56DD691D647568495D7EE599620222C6-ZZ@homebase1.prodigy.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 18:12:33 -0500
From: "Philip Jonkers" <PHILIPJONKERS@prodigy.net>
Subject: Re: The necessity of mental memes
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

>> In other words, the behavior itself was a
requirement of the learning
>> process.
>> And, I really don't think there is _any_ situation
where that is not true.
>
>Think of Stephen Hawkins. He hasn't much
possibilities for any
>kind of behaviors. So how does he learn about the
universe?

He literally has a very active universal imagination.

Philip.

===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

Next message: Dace: "Re: Scientology 2/2"
Previous message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: A Confusing Example"
Maybe in reply to: Joe Dees: "The necessity of mental memes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 20 2002 - 23:49:22 GMT