Re: The necessity of mental memes

From: Dace (edace@earthlink.net)
Date: Sun Jan 20 2002 - 21:59:47 GMT

  • Next message: Keith Henson: "Re: sex and the single meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA10552 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:03:00 GMT
    Message-ID: <010601c1a1fd$c7d7efe0$b186b2d1@teddace>
    From: "Dace" <edace@earthlink.net>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <AA-58D24272F44CB21DAE529FE4BC2EA9A1-ZZ@homebase1.prodigy.net>
    Subject: Re: The necessity of mental memes
    Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 13:59:47 -0800
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
    X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    From: Philip Jonkers

    > What the guys in the artifact-behavior meme-camp argue
    > is that it is wrong to speak of memes residing in the
    > brain for no other reason that they don't fit with any
    > of the current definitions. They are undetectable,
    > highly personal and non-uniform in stored form.

    While it's true that no one has ever found a meme in the brain, no one has
    ever found a thought or a feeling or a memory or a perception or a desire or
    any other mental function in the brain. Clearly, memes exist in minds. The
    problem is trying to reduce mind to brain.

    Ted

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 20 2002 - 22:10:56 GMT